Eragon The Movie vs. Eragon The Novel Essay

People earn distinct views in life. most would pick out to wallow with the beauty of words and the power of the conceit, while others would opt for movies and witness the wonders of visual effect. Some of the stories made turn out to be inspirations for whatsoever(prenominal), while others be fall out a driving force for plurality to go on and continue with life. One of the most interesting stories in countersigns is Eragon. Due to the legend and the lessons that both children and adults would learn, the novel was adapted as a movie into the uncollectible screen. However, I believe that the novel version of Eragon is tranquillise better than the movie version.THE STORY The story revolves around a small boy, named Eragon, who grew up in a small farm in Carvahall together with his uncle and cousin. During one of his hunting trips in the mountains, he found a big blue stone. The stone attracted him greatly, and Eragon thought that if sold in the city, the stone would be enough to suffice for their winter needs. Unkn feature to Eragon, the blue stone was truly a dragon egg, ready to hatch. Since care for dragons was prohibited by the king, Eragon had no survival of the volleytest but to secretly raise the poor animal, naming her Saphira.Eventually, they were pursue down by the kings men and had no prime(a) but to flee the village. Eragons uncle, Garrow, died due to his injuries, making him furious and peckish for revenge. Eragons journey towards survival with Saphira led to more secrets. In the melody of their adventures, Brom proposed that he would do whatever it takes to help Eragon. The symbol in Eragons hand shows that he is indeed one of the dragon passengers, like how Brom employ to be. Towards the course of the journey, he was transformed from an ordinary teenager to a sword-fighting rider knowledgeable in magic and the ways of Dragon Riders.Eragon meets more people and encounters more life-threatening situations towards the course of the journey, which allows him to learn more about himself. His postulate for revenge allowed him to learn more about himself, and how his search for answers would lead him to foster a whole Empire. SIMILARITIES AND DIFFERENCES Books always pay their own identity as compared to the dissipate alterations. This may be attributed to the fact that readers are given the chance to view the novel in their own way, and see things according to what their imagination has to offer.The book and call for version of Eragon had the same dilemma. Both media had the opportunity to office with people the wonders that Eragons life had to offer, and at the same time conduce them to a world unknown to many. However, the 2 media used alike had their own differences. The film version was intricately made in such a way that the viewing audience would become curious of what the story has to offer. The special effects used in the film version would definitely come as an impressive work of art. The descriptions set in the book, such as Saphiras appearance were perfectly executed in the film.One who has read the book with agree with me, especially in the details set for the other locations in the film. The language used in both versions were also similar with individually other. The book on the other hand, made us of too many words. Some of the dialogues and scenes were cut in the film version, somehow giving the viewers a different impression of how the story would go. Take for example Eragons journey. Some of the places were deleted, and even Eragons reactions towards Katrina were deleted in the film version. In this manner, the spot of the story was somewhat changed deviating from the trustworthy context of the novel.PERSONAL ANALYSIS The film version of Eragon was something to be considered. Those who have read the novel would have different impressions about the adaptation, especially when some of the important scenes and dialogues have been deleted. Although the aim o f the producers was to fit the whole book in one film, this should have been done use a different approach. In the same manner, I also delight in how the visual effects were executed. Saphira was one of the wonders of the whole story, and this was very well presented in the film adaptation.Arya herself was a wonder to marvel at. As the book would have it, she was a beautiful elf, and was supposed to look mysterious at some point in the story. This was done perfectly, and I believe the actress who played her should also be given credit. Unfortunately, the film and the book had so many differences. The film version would look as if it was another story formed from the original novel, and not an adaptation. Although both had considered to keep the plot as the center of the film, the choice of words made the story difficult to absorb.Both readers and viewers would have difficulty in trying to keep in tune with the story because of the many names and places it included. For someone who has seen both media, disappointment would not come as a surprise. However, for those who have not read the book, the film adaptation is impressive, especially with how Saphira was manipulated.Works CitedEragon. Dir. Stefan Fanmeier. Perf. Jeremy Irons, John Malkovich, Sienna Guillory, Edward Speleers, and Rachel Weisz. 20th Century Fox denture Entertainment, 20 March 2007. Paolini, Christopher. Eragon. Alfred A.Knopf Books for Young Readers, 2003. Eragon. 2006. Eragon the Movie. 22 January 2009 <http//www. eragonmovie. com/main. html? cid=us>. Eragon. The network Movie Database. 22 January 2009 <http//www. imdb. com/title/tt0449010/>. Eragon. Book Browse. 22 Janury 2009 <http//www. bookbrowse. com/reviews/index. cfm? book_number=1284>. Eragon (Inheritance, Book I). 2003. Kids work out Central. 22 January 2009 <http//www. kidsturncentral. com/topics/books/eragon. htm>. Eragon DVD Review. 22 January 2009 <http//www. shurtugal. com/news/comments. php? id=558& ampanum=50>.