The Martig Case Study

The Martig case study is perfect example of how poor date trouble activities can lead to envision failure. There are different problems discussed in each paragraph which illustrates the absence seizure of well-defined business summons resulting in lack of synchronization and conflicts among different departments. For a image to be successful, its crucial to have well planned and balanced organization structure which will make coordination and intercourse clear as well as easy.The first problem is perfect example of leadership failure. afterward Martig seniors death, Martig Junior holds the position of president but his efforts to sell of the business and take long vacations every calendar month shows his loss of interest in the organization.The project managers depend on Martig for feedback and instructions on certain decisions, except its observed they misuse this situation by making their own shot and are in a consistent battle for power.This problem can be simply solved i f Martig Junior makes efforts to change his operative style and focus little more on the business. The president is expected to make major decisions link up to finance, management etc, and should be available so that project managers can reach him out, involve him in discussions and suck his opinions in decision making. This will maintain his authority in organization and would not give project managers an opportunity to make their own decisions which major power cause business failure.The next problem discussed is about the estimating department. As per the set business rules, its mandatory to involve project managers in proposal estimates to provide feedbacks to update the standards. However, its seen that this never happens in the organization. The project managers hesitate in giving the honest feedbacks as they fear that the estimator might be the next candidate for the executive promotion. This problem can be eliminated by maintaining the proper pecking order and clarity a bout the candidates in position for promotion.In third problem is improper assignment of work. This is seen to be happening since there is no transparency in business processes and lack of communication. The procurement work reports to Martig, because of his absence project managers assumes procurement as their work. If Martig is available to do his job, the project managers will not have to shake off extra hours doing the work which is not assigned to them. Project Managers are spending approximately 35% of sentence in procurement activities, if there is proper assignment of responsibilities the project managers can utilize their time in job assigned to them or activities which require attention.In last problem, we see the incorrect attitude of localize superintendents towards project managers. The superintendents believe that they hold the same position as of the project manager. However, they are not tough in procurement activities which upsets them, so they find modes to an noy project manager.The case study says that whenever the project manager is present at the site, the work is delayed, and the report sent to the home office is inaccurate. One way of resolving this dispute is, the site superintendents can discuss and ask their supervisor to make changes to the existing process so to give them chance to be involved in procurement function.The other solution is that the project manager can confront the site superintendents to discuss this matter and if they are not able to disperse this, then supervisors should be involved. It is very important for both project and site superintendents to have a wakeless work relation so as to complete the assigned tasks and make project a success.